A somewhat regularly updated collection of news and other stuff related to carbon capture and storage (CCS).
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Mind the Clean Energy Skills Gap
This article mentions a rarely mentioned issue when discussing the transition to a sustainable energy economy: engineer/expertise availability.Monday, November 10, 2014
ADM carbon capture nears initial goal; second permit sought
Along with the plans to capture CCS from a steel mill in the United Arab Emirates, the Illinois Basin Project is the second large-scale industrial project equipped with CCS that is expected to become operational over the next couple of years.UAE's carbon capture project to remove 800.000 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year
Since the opening of Boundary Dam a month ago, there seems to be a significant uptick in CCS-related news around the net. In particular, journalists have discovered the most recent "Global Status of CCS" report. Although issued already in February, it has gone relatively unnoticed until recently. However, along with the news from Boundary Dam, it provides a background narrative of CCS regaining momentum despite significant setbacks over the last years. In particular, the report notes a 50 percent increase in projects under construction or in operation since 2011, with Boundary Dam as the most prominent example.However, the report also mentions developments for CCS in the industrial sector, which until now has been little discussed. Whereas CO2 emissions from power production can at least in theory be replaced (in the longer run) by renewable energy, no such substitution is possible in the production of commodities such as cement, petrochemicals and steel. In these cases, the emissions do not so much stem from energy generation from fossil fuels, as from release of CO2 inherent to the input materials and manufacturing process itself.
Emissions from the industrial sector are significant. According to IEA, they constitute between one fourth and one third of worldwide CO2 emissions. Since changing to renewable energy sources will do nothing about these emissions, CCS is the only option available to curb them. However, little has happened on this front.
Until now.
According to the aforementioned report, two industrial CCS projects will become operational over the next two years. One is the Illinois Industrial CCS Project, which is expected to start operations in 2015. The plant captures CO2 from the production of biofuels, which means that it may actually be producing negative emissions. Moreover, the captured CO2 will be stored in an onshore saline formation, meaning it will not be used for enhanced oil recovery, like so many other CO2 injection operations in the US.
The other project mentioned by the report is the UAE carbon capture project to remove 800.000 tonnes of CO2 annually from steel production. The captured CO2 will here be used for enhanced oil recovery. Whereas critics may question the environmental friendliness of such a scheme, there are a few arguments why this is, in fact, a relevant event for emission reductions. First of all, oil produced from CO2 injection will necessarily have a lower impact on total CO2 emissions due to the carbon locked up by the CO2 injections themselves. Second, as a the pioneer CCS project for the steel industry, it will provide a very interesting case study both for the industry itself and the wider researcher community. Lessons learned from this project may help develop the technology, bring down costs, and lower the barriers for applying CCS elsewhere.
Overall, the Illinois and UAE projects may become to the industrial sector what Boundary Dam has been for the electricity generating sector: powerful examples of CCS as proven technologies.
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
Strictly come warming: Swing time at the UN (bbc.com)
Carbon Capture and Storage has been given a prominent place in the recent synthesis report by the IPCC. In itself, that ought to be a good thing; CCS is by most measures a necessary bridge to a more sustainable energy system, and should be treated as such. However, one must be careful not to let the concept be hijacked by those whose vested interest really lies in preserving the status quo.
Carbon capture technology could take off this decade - report (rtcc.org)
"The development of technology allowing power plants to burn fossil fuels without spewing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere is accellerating, a report has found."The report is from the Global CCS Institute, which notes a significant increase in construction and operation of carbon capture and storage facilities since 2011.
It registers 13 operating plants wordwide, another eight to go online by 2016, and a total of 27 projects in the pipeline (twelve in China, nine in the US and six in Europe).
The next two large-scale CCS facilities projects expected to come online are Kemper County Energy Facility in Mississippi and the Petra Nova Carbon Capture Project in Texas.
Of course, the number of projects fall far short of where we should be at this point, but at least the arrows are turning (slowly) in the right direction.
Labels:
CCS,
critics,
Kemper,
Peterhead,
Petra Nova,
projections,
Shell
Tuesday, November 4, 2014
A bit of thermodynamics (theenergycollective)
Some reasons why industrial uses of CO2 will never play any significant role in reducing CO2 emissions.
- CO2 sits at the bottom of a "deep thermodynamic well", meaning it has very low chemical energy, and any chemical use that converts CO2 into something else will need energy inputs similar to that produced when CO2 was created in the first place.
- Any use of CO2 for commodities such as plastic will most only mean a temporary delay before the CO2 is again released into the atmosphere when the commodity eventually is disposed of and decomposes.
The article also mentions using CO2 for enhanced oil recovery, which is the single industrial use which:
- involves considerable quantities of CO2
- actually sequesters the CO2 underground
29 bullets tell all about climate change (Scientific American)
From the article, based on the recent report by IPCC: "It is highly unlikely the world will stay below 450 ppm without widespread use of carbon capture and storage technologies."
Monday, November 3, 2014
We need widespread adaption of this technology to curb climate change, and we aren't close
According to the IPCC, the cost of mitigating climate change without widespread CCS use will eventually be 138 percent greater than what it will take to limit damage if there's a lot of it.
By comparison, deploying solar and wind would only reduce the cost of mitigating climate change by 6 percent. For nuclear, it's 7 percent.
Friday, October 31, 2014
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
Friday, October 24, 2014
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Monday, October 13, 2014
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Cameron calls for coal phase out
The exact words of the tweet from the UK Prime Minister during the UN General Assembly: "We’ve said no to new coal [without] carbon capture and storage and plan to phase out existing coal over next 10-15 years."
The message is clear. No new coal plants without CCS in the UK. Taken at face value, this message could mean a lot of CCS activity in the coming years.
The exact words of the tweet from the UK Prime Minister during the UN General Assembly: "We’ve said no to new coal [without] carbon capture and storage and plan to phase out existing coal over next 10-15 years."
The message is clear. No new coal plants without CCS in the UK. Taken at face value, this message could mean a lot of CCS activity in the coming years.
Second ADM sequestration OK'd
Another roadblock cleared for a second, significantly scaled-up sequestration project at Decatur! With the FutureGen II project also moving forward, Illinois is becoming an interesting place from a CCS perspective.
Another roadblock cleared for a second, significantly scaled-up sequestration project at Decatur! With the FutureGen II project also moving forward, Illinois is becoming an interesting place from a CCS perspective.
SaskPower to launch carbon-capture power plant
Seems like the CCS operations at the Boundary Dam plant will finally start this week. Whereas part of the captured CO2 will be sold for EOR operations, the article also suggest that a significant amount will be directly sequestered three kilometers underground.
Of course, some environmental organizations would rather see the money being invested in non-carbon energy. But what would then happen with all the world's coal plants - could we assume they would just go away?
Seems like the CCS operations at the Boundary Dam plant will finally start this week. Whereas part of the captured CO2 will be sold for EOR operations, the article also suggest that a significant amount will be directly sequestered three kilometers underground.
Of course, some environmental organizations would rather see the money being invested in non-carbon energy. But what would then happen with all the world's coal plants - could we assume they would just go away?
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Friday, September 12, 2014
Labels:
alternative,
basalt,
capture,
CCS,
China,
coal,
economics,
EOR,
EPA,
Jackson Dome,
Kemper,
Norway,
Petra Nova,
Sleipner,
storage,
USA
Thursday, September 11, 2014
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
Saturday, August 23, 2014
World's largest post combustion CO2 capture system for a coal power plant
Capturing the communications opportunity for carbon capture and storage
Friday, August 22, 2014
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)